n8n Workflow Validation Dilemma

As I was preparing for a launch, I decided to run an audit on my n8n workflows using the n8n_validate_workflow tool. To my surprise, it flagged over 30 nodes with outdated typeVersions. Although everything runs smoothly at runtime thanks to n8n's backward compatibility, the validator prefers newer versions. After digging deeper, I discovered that the issue lay in how I was using Claude Code and the n8n MCP tool. It turns out that the MCP tool was hardcoding typeVersions from training data instead of calling get_node first. The tool actually provides the correct version if you ask for it, injecting a warning in the get_node response. However, my AI setup wasn't making this call. To fix this, I added a mandatory rule: always call get_node before configuring any node and use the version from the response. This led me to a critical decision point. I have an IF node still on typeVersion 1, while the current default is 2.3. The schemas are completely incompatible, and this node controls an anti-bot gate. A wrong condition migration could silently open the door, rather than triggering an error. Now, I'm faced with a choice: leave the old typeVersions and accept the validator warnings or do a full migration before going live. What's your approach to handling such validation warnings? Do you prioritize caution and migrate everything to ensure compatibility, or do you weigh the risks and benefits of leaving some nodes on older typeVersions? Share your thoughts and experiences in the WebNutch community, and let's discuss the best practices for workflow validation and migration in the context of the WebNutch marketplace.